One more for the road...
Mood:
a-ok
Topic: Political
I have said it since back in February when this campaign got serious. This election is about more than Republican vs. Democrat or liberal vs. conservative. It's about more than Bush vs. Kerry. This election is a battle for the soul of America.
What kind of nation do we want to be? That is the question. Tomorrow we answer it. Do we want to be a nation that is based on fear, anger, exclusion and hate? Or do we want to be the nation that we are capable of being? A nation that believes in equal opportunity for all. A nation that strives to reach our highest potential. That's what it's all about.
It is my hope, my prayer, that come tomorrow we will wake up and rise to the occasion. It is my sincere belief that a great nation will rise again for this election. I believe that we will recapture the greatness that has been missing for the last four years. I have faith in the greatness of my country. I believe she will show up tomorrow and we will take that first step back towards the nation that is our heritage and our birth right. America deserves better and tomorrow we'll get it.
Bruce Mulkey of BruceMulkey.com said it better than I can. Here is the article from his website. Enjoy.
Good luck tomorrow. I'll talk to you on Wednesday...
What kind of America do you want to wake up to on November 3?
October 30 , 2004
For all of the negative ads, for all of the half-truths and outright lies by the candidates, for all of the faux debates, for all of the 15-second sound bites, at its core this presidential election is a struggle for the soul of America.
If you were thinking that the question was whether to vote for Bush or Kerry, for the Republican or the Democrat, guess again. The real issue is whether you will cast a vote for a group of true believers who have undertaken what they consider to be a divinely sanctioned crusade or leaders who want to empower everyone who wishes to participate in the political process regardless of ethnic origin, spiritual practice or sexual preference. For an administration that fantasizes about a Pax Americana in which the US rules the world through military might or a government that seeks to rejoin the family of nations and regain the respect that once was ours. Toward a court system packed with fundamentalist judges who want to turn back the clock or a justice system in which diversity is truly valued and everyone is equal under the law.
A DIRECT LINE TO GOD?
George W. Bush believes he was divinely chosen to lead our nation. What's more, he evidently gets instructions from the heavens on which enemies to smite. "God told me to strike at Al Qaida, and I struck them," Bush declared. "And then He instructed me to strike at Saddam, which I did." Conversely, John Kerry takes a more humble approach to faith and leadership. In his speech accepting the Democratic nomination for president in July, Kerry stated, "I don't want to claim that God is on our side. As Abraham Lincoln told us, I want to pray humbly that we are on God's side."
WITH A LITTLE HELP FROM OUR FRIENDS
In September 2002 the Bush administration unveiled its National Security Strategy. Drawing heavily from the neoconservative Project for the New American Century, Bush, Rumsfeld, et al revealed their blueprint for US world domination, advocating the use of pre-emptive military strikes to subdue real or imagined foes and extend US power around the globe. On the other hand, John Kerry has pledged to free America from its dangerous dependence on Mideast oil and create new alliances among the nations of the world to deal with the threat of terrorism.
SUPREME COURT APPOINTMENTS ON THE HORIZON
The next president may get to appoint as many as three Supreme Court Justices, appointments with long-term ramifications for our society. And with the announcement Monday that Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, 80, is suffering from thyroid cancer, one such appointment may be imminent. Bush revealed what sort of nominees can be expected should he win reelection when he appointed Alabama Attorney General William Pryor to the Eleventh US Circuit Court of Appeals despite the fact that Pryor has a record of opposing civil rights, women's rights and federal environmental protections. And though Kerry has not disclosed a list of potential nominees, he has frequently quoted the late Justice Potter Stewart, who once said," 'The mark of a good judge is a judge whose opinion you can read and have no idea if the judge was a man or a woman, Republican or Democrat, a Christian or a Jew. You just know he or she was a good judge."
George W. Bush was not elected in 2000 in the usual sense; he lost the popular vote and was declared president by a 5-4 Supreme Court decision. Even so, he has pursued a zealous right wing agenda that has polarized the nation and been disavowed by some life-long Republicans, such as John Eisenhower, son of Dwight D. Eisenhower, and some of the conservative media, including The American Conservative magazine. It's not hard to imagine what extreme policies Bush might engage in if the American people legitimize the past four years by rewarding him with another four.
There is a choice, of course. There always is. Will you choose the candidate who, unwilling to run on his record, appeals to our basest instincts and tries to scare us into voting for him? Or will you choose the candidate who calls out the best in us and reminds us what America truly stands for?
In this election year, the future of our nation hangs in the balance. And while we have no control over the outcome, each of us can do our part. My hope is that you will wake up next Wednesday morning with the satisfaction of knowing you've done everything you could possibly do to change the course of America toward peace, prosperity, justice and sustainability.
Well said Bruce. Check out his site. www.brucemulkey.com
Submitted by infrared41
at 10:58 PM EST
Updated: Monday, 1 November 2004 11:08 PM EST